Compliance engineering

GDPR is a security requirement, not just a legal one.

GDPR's Article 32 requires \u201cappropriate technical and organizational measures\u201d to secure personal data — and its 72-hour breach-notification clock is a detection problem before it's a paperwork one. We build the security side of GDPR into your systems.

The part lawyers can't do for you

A privacy policy and a records-of-processing register are necessary — and they're the easy half. The half that gets tested in an incident is technical: is the data actually encrypted, is access actually controlled and logged, would you actually detect a breach in time to report it within 72 hours?

What we build

The Article 32 measures, for realEncryption at rest and in transit, access control and least-privilege, pseudonymization where it fits, and the resilience and recovery the regulation expects.

Breach detection that beats the clockYou can't report what you haven't noticed. The 72-hour window is a detection requirement — so we make sure logging and monitoring would actually surface a personal-data breach in time to assess and report it.

Evidence you can show a regulatorDemonstrable, ongoing security — not a binder assembled after the fact. The same monitoring that protects the data proves you were protecting it.

The mindset shift: companies that treat GDPR as fine-avoidance buy documents. Companies that treat it as the regulator requiring what good data hygiene looks like anyway end up more resilient — and audit-ready — as a side effect. We build the second kind.

Is your GDPR posture real or just documented?

Tell us what personal data you handle and how. We'll reply with an honest read on where the technical measures need work.

Get in touch →