Vendor scorecard
CISA lists 4 Accellion vulnerabilities as exploited in the wild, 0 of them added in the last 12 months (flat from 0 in the 12 months before). 4 (100%) are known to be used in ransomware campaigns. Most affected: FTA (4).
| Product | KEV entries |
|---|---|
| FTA | 4 |
| CVE | Vulnerability | Added |
|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-27104 | Accellion FTA OS Command Injection VulnerabilityRANSOMWAREFTA | |
| CVE-2021-27103 | Accellion FTA Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) VulnerabilityRANSOMWAREFTA | |
| CVE-2021-27102 | Accellion FTA OS Command Injection VulnerabilityRANSOMWAREFTA | |
| CVE-2021-27101 | Accellion FTA SQL Injection VulnerabilityRANSOMWAREFTA |
Get an email when CISA adds the next Accellion CVE.
How to read this: CISA KEV lists vulnerabilities with reliable evidence of exploitation; a vendor with many entries is often one with a large, internet-facing install base, not necessarily worse engineering. "Publication → KEV" is the median number of days between the CVE's publication and its addition to KEV, for entries added in the last 24 months (0 entries); it is an upper bound on how long defenders had, since exploitation usually starts before the listing. Under NIS2 article 21(2)(d), supplier security is part of your risk management; this page is a starting point for that review. Compare vendors on the scorecard index.
We assess supplier security for NIS2 and DORA, from exploited-CVE history and patch response to contract clauses and evidence packs.
Get in touch →