Vendor scorecard
CISA lists 2 ThinkPHP vulnerabilities as exploited in the wild, 0 of them added in the last 12 months (flat from 0 in the 12 months before). 0 (0%) are known to be used in ransomware campaigns. Most affected: noneCms (1), ThinkPHP (1).
| Product | KEV entries |
|---|---|
| noneCms | 1 |
| ThinkPHP | 1 |
| CVE | Vulnerability | Added |
|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-9082 | ThinkPHP Remote Code Execution VulnerabilityThinkPHP | |
| CVE-2018-20062 | ThinkPHP "noneCms" Remote Code Execution VulnerabilitynoneCms |
Get an email when CISA adds the next ThinkPHP CVE.
How to read this: CISA KEV lists vulnerabilities with reliable evidence of exploitation; a vendor with many entries is often one with a large, internet-facing install base, not necessarily worse engineering. "Publication → KEV" is the median number of days between the CVE's publication and its addition to KEV, for entries added in the last 24 months (0 entries); it is an upper bound on how long defenders had, since exploitation usually starts before the listing. Under NIS2 article 21(2)(d), supplier security is part of your risk management; this page is a starting point for that review. Compare vendors on the scorecard index.
We assess supplier security for NIS2 and DORA, from exploited-CVE history and patch response to contract clauses and evidence packs.
Get in touch →